Letter to Taylor from Leverett, January 22, 1904
Scope and Contents
The correspondence series includes approximately 1100 letters written between 1892-1939. The majority of the collection are letters between Frank Leverett and Frank Bursley Taylor; they discuss their field work, Monograph 53, other publications and various related problems. There is also other correspondence with other geologists, including T.C. Chamberlin, Grove K. Gilbert, J.W. Goldthwait, H.L. Fairchild, et alia. There is extensive correspondence with the U.S. Geological Survey, the Geological Survey of Canada, and the Michigan Geological Survey. The primary subject of this series is the surficial glacial geology of the midwestern U.S. and Canada. Leverett & Taylor's work was essential for understanding how the Great Lakes were formed as the Pleistocene glaciers advanced and retreated from the midwestern states. The letters describe the 30 year process of gathering data, mapping the data and constructing the picture of glacial processes during the last Ice Age.
Dates
- Creation: January 22, 1904
Conditions Governing Access
The collection is open for research.
Conditions Governing Access
The material is stored offsite in Remote Storage. Please contact Special Collections 3 working days in advance if you wish to use it.
Extent
From the Collection: 1 Linear Feet
Language of Materials
English
General
Rec'd your letter of the 20th and your data. I sent C.W. Hayes date of Sept. 1 as when "our monograph" may be expected. I have a lot of writing and illustrations to do, and you have more field work as well as writing. I had a letter from Cooper and I think the Saginaw beaches will need more work as he did not make continuous tracings but did aneroid readings when he found a beach. There are 5 matters that will require much more detailed work. Pearson visited Ann Arbor last week; he believes in sea level change as opposed to uplift. "He bored Russell, Davis and me for two or three hours and even took 1 1/2 hours of Pres. Angell's time." He is trying to get support to get a grant from the Carnegie Institution. His sanity may be open to question. Pearson seem blind to the facts against his hypothesis.
Repository Details
Part of the Stephen O. Murray and Keelung Hong Special Collections Repository